Studies on Multitasking Highlight Value of Self-Control
Simply put, the brain can’t be in two places at once.
In a landmark 2009 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Stanford University researchers compared the attention-switching abilities of people who said they multitasked often with those of people who did so rarely. It found that the frequent multitaskers were more easily distracted and performed worse on memory and attention tests than those who preferred to do one thing at a time.
1000reasonsnottostartmakingart:
via miguelendara.com
Oh, this makes me want to draw so badly…
Thanks to orangeyy for suggesting this wonderful video!
Jesus tap-dancing Christ.
(via cloudymiles)
[An extraterrestrial robot and spaceship has just landed on earth. The robot steps out of the spaceship…]
“I come in peace,” it said, adding after a long moment of further grinding, “take me to your Lizard.”
Ford Prefect, of course, had an explanation for this, as he sat with Arthur and watched the nonstop frenetic news reports on television, none of which had anything to say other than to record that the thing had done this amount of damage which was valued at that amount of billions of pounds and had killed this totally other number of people, and then say it again, because the robot was doing nothing more than standing there, swaying very slightly, and emitting short incomprehensible error messages.
“It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see…”
“You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?”
”Nothing so simple. Nothing anything like so straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people.”
“Odd.” said Arthur. “i thought you said it was a democracy.”
“I did” said Ford. “It is.”
”So” said Arthur, hoping he wasn’t sounding ridiculously obtuse, “why don’t the people get rid of the lizards?”
“It honestly doesn’t occur to them.” said Ford. “they’ve all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they’ve voted in more or less approximates to the government they want.”
“You mean they actually vote for the lizards?”
“Oh yes.” said Ford with a shrug, “Of course.”
“But,” said Arthur, going for the big one again “Why?”
“Because if they didn’t vote for a lizard,” said Ford, “the wrong lizard might get in. Got any gin?”
“What?”
“I said,” said Ford, with an incerasing air of urgency creeping into his voice “Have you got any gin?”
‘I’ll look. tell me about the lizards.”
Ford shrugged again. “Some people say that the lizards are the best thing that ever happened to them.” he said. “They’re complteely wrong of course, completely and utterly wrong, but someones got to say it.”
“But that’s terrible,” said Arthur.
From So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish by Douglas Adams.
And when ‘progress for women’ comes at the expense of, say, the gay community, that’s not actually progress for women at all. That’s just progress for straight women. When it comes at the expense of women of color, that’s just progress for white women. When it comes at the expense of trans women, that’s just progress for cis women. And so on.
That’s why an inclusive feminism is the only feminism that ultimately makes any sense—and an inclusive feminism is only possible when privileged women (white women, straight women, cis women, thin women, able-bodied women, Western women, wealthy women, employed women, etc.) acknowledge their relative privilege to other women.
Are you in England or South Wales? Do you want to save books from being pulped? This organisation runs centres where you can take books home for free.
As someone with a disability, one of the things I often hear is assumptions about performance. Usually it’s no one who knows me, or an overheard conversation, maybe it’s a scrap of overheard conversation or a side-note in a newspaper editorial.
What I hear is fundamental lack of understanding on the topic of coping. I’ve heard it from doctors, I’ve heard it from therapists, I’ve heard it most of all from people simply conversing.
When you’re doing - anything, no matter what it is - and you have a disability, there’s this tendency of assumption on the part of others that even if it comes back later, for now, your disability is gone. Poof. Vanished. Sure, while you’re lying in bed that afternoon due to stress and exhaustion you’re disabled, but three hours earlier, out grocery shopping, they see you and you’re fine so what gives?
Here’s what gives. I can’t speak for all, but for most disabilities there’s a cost of coping. There’s a cost of maintaining, of pushing back symptoms long enough to do sometimes even the most basic of things. When you’re getting your groceries you aren’t just getting your groceries, you’re also managing your energy and stress levels, monitoring your body, and yes
coping
The unseen cost of coping is what most people without disabilities don’t understand. That even when you appear to be asymptomatic, there’s a cost. That the ability to cope doesn’t necessarily mean you’re any less disabled, not when that hour long grocery trip costs you hours, or days, in recovery. So the next time you ask your disabled friend, or family member, or client, or patient, or student, why they can’t just do whatever it is you want them to do because you saw them at the grocery store the other day so they’re obviously capable of coping?
Please just remember that we pay for coping, just like we pay for not coping. The cost may be hidden to you, but it’s not to us.
-anon submission
(bolding by mod)
(via flapjackstate)
Dear stupid motherfuckers playing dressup :
I’m buggin over the sheer amount of closet-racism on this website.
You wana be racist? Cool, I give no shits, just don’t deny it. Wusses deny it.
ಠ__ಠ chu ga lae, like I don’t see what you did there.A sexist joke is still sexist; Being a joke doesn’t remove the actual content. It just tells the listener that while your statement is sexist, you may not be. Makes sense right?
A caricature portrayal of a race is a racist joke. It’s still racist.
Are you racist? Maybe, maybe not. But you did post a racist thing, make sense again? Denying that a thing is racist, then blaming anyone who finds it racist, as if they wronged you personally, is utterly ridiculous. It’s not just a dick move, it lacks an ounce of coherent logic, and does make you seem like a supremacist, sorry bro.
Let’s play FIND THAT LOGIC FLAW so that people can just.. be less annoying.1. You can’t defend your right to free expression while demanding someone else be silent. That’s fucking stupid, come on now, you know it is. The right to criticize others is part of free speech, no one is threatening your free speech by using their own.
2. You literally have no ability to dictate how other people can or can’t feel about your expressions. By trying to, you are attempting to degrade or manipulate people into submission - See how that’s not ok? See how it’s supremacisty? Your concept of what I “should” feel does not trump my right to my own.
3. We aren’t challenging anyone’s free speech, as we aren’t actually telling these assmonkeys they “legally can’t” appropriate shit or be racist, we’re just saying they shouldn’t, because it’s a dick move (not the same as can’t) you can express and wear what you want, and we can hate you for poor choices.4. Feminists : If you appropriate Native stuff with the excuse “in protest of patriarchy”.. Hate to break it to your ignorant ass, but most Native nations are matrilineal, we don’t have a patriarchy. Your point would be better made by wearing an Abe Lincoln hat.
5. and if you do it anyway, should have the decency and maturity to admit that it is, in fact, racist.. Rather than getting butthurt over the not-at-all-shocking fact that racist caricatures offend people.
over 9000. It isn’t honoring, appreciating, respecting, or harmless. If any of these words were applicable, we wouldn’t still be telling you to piss off. It’s not honor or appreciative because it’s inaccurate regurgitated stereotypes. It’s not respect because you seem to fucking hate and shun us when we are kind enough to offer authentic facts about our cultures. It’s not harmless because it dehumanizes and exotifies us.
“Sorry you were offended but I don’t think it should offend you” is not a valid response unless you are trying to express that you see me as inherently lesser than you.
Do you understand yet?Beautiful.
[Image description: Photo of a person with chin length black and blonde hair with a black cat on their shoulder. Text reads: “authentic native american with animal companion notice the lack of costume bullshit?”
(via themindislimitless)
Source: attributed by Jean-Pierre Raffarin, when Jacques Chirac addressed Silvio Berlusconi over the invasion of Iraq, 20 o’clock news, TF1, March 11th 2007
Missoula public library. Banned books week.
[Image description: Library books on a shelf covered in brown paper with barcodes and descriptions of the contents hand written in black pen. E.g. ‘i reference lesbianism, erections, & pornography’, ‘i encourage disobedience & contain supernatural themes’.]
(via azelie)